Easy2Siksha

GNDU Answer Paper-2021

M.A I

Semester

Renaissance Drama

Time Allowed: Three Hours Maximum Marks: 80

Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The

Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.

SECTION-A

1.Define and discuss Aristotle's treatment of 'Peripeteia' and 'Hamartia pertaining to

Tragedy in The Poetics.

Ans: Introduction to Aristotle and The Poetics

1. Understanding Tragedy according to Aristotle

2. Peripeteia: Definition and Explanation

3. Hamartia: Definition and Explanation

4. The Relationship between Peripeteia and Hamartia

5. Examples from Greek Tragedies

6. Importance of these Concepts in Tragedy

7. Modern Interpretations and Applications

8. Critiques and Debates

9. Conclusion

10. Introduction to Aristotle and The Poetics

Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who lived from 384 to 322 BCE. He was a student of Plato

and is considered one of the most influential thinkers in Western philosophy. Aristotle

wrote on many subjects, including physics, metaphysics, poetry, theater, music, logic,

rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology, and zoology.

The Poetics is one of Aristotle's most famous works. It's a short book, but it has had a huge

impact on how we think about literature, especially drama. In The Poetics, Aristotle talks

Easy2Siksha

about different kinds of poetry, but he focuses mostly on tragedy. He explains what he

thinks makes a good tragedy and what elements it should have.

2. Understanding Tragedy according to Aristotle

Before we dive into 'Peripeteia' and 'Hamartia', it's important to understand what Aristotle

meant by tragedy. For Aristotle, a tragedy wasn't just any sad story. It was a specific type of

play that had certain features:

• It was serious (not funny like a comedy)

• It was about important people (like kings or heroes)

• It showed a person going from good fortune to bad fortune

• It was meant to make the audience feel pity and fear

• It was supposed to give the audience a kind of emotional release (which Aristotle

called 'catharsis')

Aristotle thought that a good tragedy should have six parts:

1. Plot (the story)

2. Character (the people in the story)

3. Thought (the ideas in the story)

4. Diction (the words used to tell the story)

5. Melody (the music, if any)

6. Spectacle (how the play looks on stage)

Of these, Aristotle thought the plot was the most important. And two key elements of a

good tragic plot, according to Aristotle, were 'Peripeteia' and 'Hamartia'.

3. Peripeteia: Definition and Explanation

'Peripeteia' is a Greek word that we can translate as "reversal" or "sudden change". In the

context of tragedy, it means a sudden change in the hero's fortune, usually from good to

bad.

• Think of it like this: the hero in a tragedy usually starts off in a good situation. They

might be powerful, respected, or happy. But then something happens that

completely changes their situation. Suddenly, they find themselves in trouble or

facing a big problem.

• This change isn't just any change, though. It's not like the hero just has a bad day. A

true peripeteia is a dramatic, unexpected turn of events that changes everything for

the hero.

• Here's an example to make it clearer: Imagine a king who thinks he's doing a great

job ruling his kingdom. Everyone seems to love him, and everything is going well. But

Easy2Siksha

then, out of nowhere, he finds out that he actually killed his own father years ago

without knowing it, and that he's married to his mother. That's a peripeteia - a

sudden, dramatic reversal of fortune.

• Aristotle thought that peripeteia was really important in tragedy because it creates

surprise and emotion in the audience. It makes us feel shocked and worried for the

hero. We wonder, "How did this happen?" and "What will happen next?"

4. Hamartia: Definition and Explanation

• 'Hamartia' is another Greek word. It's often translated as "tragic flaw" or "error", but

it's a bit more complicated than that.

• In simple terms, hamartia is the reason why the hero's fortune changes. It's what

causes the peripeteia. But it's not always a flaw in the hero's character, like being too

proud or too angry. It can also be a mistake, a wrong decision, or even just not

knowing something important.

• The key thing about hamartia is that it's not something totally outside the hero's

control (like being struck by lightning), but it's also not something the hero does on

purpose to hurt themselves. It's more like a mistake or an error in judgment that

leads to bad consequences.

• Let's use our king example again: The king's hamartia might be that he was too

curious about his own past. He kept asking questions and investigating, even when

people warned him to stop. This curiosity (which isn't necessarily a bad thing) led

him to discover the terrible truth about his parents, which ruined his life.

• Aristotle thought hamartia was important because it makes the hero's downfall

believable and relatable. We can understand how the hero made this mistake, and

we might even think we could have done the same thing in their situation. This

makes us feel pity for the hero, which is one of the main goals of tragedy according

to Aristotle.

5. The Relationship between Peripeteia and Hamartia

• Peripeteia and hamartia are closely connected in Aristotle's idea of tragedy. You can

think of hamartia as the cause and peripeteia as the effect.

• The hero's hamartia (flaw or error) leads to the peripeteia (reversal of fortune). But

the connection isn't always straightforward or immediate. Sometimes the hamartia

happens long before the peripeteia, and the hero doesn't realize the consequences

of their actions until much later.

• For example, in our story about the king, his hamartia (his curiosity about his past)

might have started years before, when he first left his home to avoid a prophecy.

The peripeteia (discovering the truth about his parents) comes much later, but it's

still a result of that initial curiosity and decision to leave home.

• Aristotle thought that the best tragedies had both peripeteia and hamartia working

together. The sudden reversal of fortune is more powerful when we understand why

it happened, and the hero's flaw or error is more tragic when we see its terrible

consequences.

Easy2Siksha

6. Examples from Greek Tragedies

To better understand these concepts, let's look at some examples from famous Greek

tragedies:

a) Oedipus Rex by Sophocles: This is the tragedy that inspired our king example. Oedipus is

the king of Thebes, respected and powerful. His hamartia is his determination to uncover

the truth about who killed the previous king, despite warnings to stop his investigation. The

peripeteia comes when he discovers that he himself is the killer, and that the man he killed

was his father. He also realizes he has married his own mother. This discovery leads to his

downfall.

b) Antigone by Sophocles: In this play, the new king Creon's hamartia is his stubborn pride

and refusal to listen to others. His peripeteia comes when he realizes that his decree (not to

bury his nephew) has led to the deaths of his son and wife. His fortune reverses from being

a respected new king to a broken man who has lost everything.

c) Medea by Euripides: Medea's hamartia could be seen as her excessive passion and desire

for revenge. Her peripeteia comes when she realizes that by killing her children to hurt her

husband, she has also destroyed herself.

7. Importance of these Concepts in Tragedy

Aristotle believed that peripeteia and hamartia were crucial for creating a good tragedy.

Here's why:

a) They create a complex plot: A story with sudden reversals and tragic mistakes is more

interesting than a simple story where everything goes as expected.

b) They make the hero relatable: When we see a hero make a mistake or have a flaw, we

can relate to them. We all make mistakes, after all.

c) They create emotional impact: The sudden reversal of fortune (peripeteia) shocks the

audience and makes us feel strong emotions.

d) They raise questions about fate and free will: Is the hero responsible for their downfall,

or is it just bad luck? This makes the audience think deeply about the story.

e) They contribute to catharsis: Aristotle believed that watching a tragedy could give the

audience an emotional release (catharsis). Seeing a hero fall due to a relatable mistake can

be a powerful emotional experience.

8. Modern Interpretations and Applications

While Aristotle was writing about Greek tragedies, his ideas about peripeteia and hamartia

have been applied to many other types of stories over the years:

• Shakespeare's tragedies: Plays like "Hamlet," "Macbeth," and "King Lear" all feature

heroes with clear hamartia leading to dramatic peripeteia.

• Modern novels: Many novels use these concepts. For example, in "The Great

Gatsby," Gatsby's hamartia (his obsession with the past) leads to his downfall.

Easy2Siksha

• Movies: Films often use these ideas too. In "Star Wars," Anakin Skywalker's fear of

loss (hamartia) leads to his transformation into Darth Vader (peripeteia).

• TV shows: Many TV dramas, especially those focusing on anti-heroes, use these

concepts. In "Breaking Bad," Walter White's pride (hamartia) leads to a series of

reversals throughout the show.

• Real-life narratives: These concepts are sometimes used to analyze real-life events,

especially in politics or business. A leader's flaw leading to their downfall is often

described in terms similar to hamartia and peripeteia.

9. Critiques and Debates

While Aristotle's ideas have been very influential, they've also been questioned and debated

over the years:

• Definition of hamartia: Some scholars argue that "tragic flaw" is a mistranslation,

and that hamartia should be understood more as a mistake or error than a character

flaw.

• Applicability to all tragedies: Not all tragedies follow Aristotle's formula. Some argue

that his ideas are too limiting and don't account for the full range of tragic stories.

• Cultural differences: Aristotle was writing about Greek tragedy specifically. Some

argue that his ideas don't apply as well to tragedies from other cultures.

• Oversimplification: Some critics argue that Aristotle's ideas oversimplify the

complexity of human behavior and storytelling.

• Gender bias: Some feminist critics have pointed out that Aristotle's theories were

based on plays about male heroes and may not apply as well to female characters.

10. Conclusion

Aristotle's concepts of peripeteia and hamartia are key to understanding his view of tragedy.

Peripeteia, the sudden reversal of fortune, creates dramatic tension and emotional impact.

Hamartia, the hero's flaw or error, makes the story believable and relatable.

Together, these elements contribute to what Aristotle saw as the purpose of tragedy: to

evoke pity and fear in the audience, leading to catharsis. By seeing a great person fall due to

a relatable mistake, we might reflect on our own lives and choices.

While these ideas come from ancient Greece, they continue to influence storytelling today.

Whether we're watching a classic play, a modern movie, or even following real-world

events, we often see echoes of Aristotle's peripeteia and hamartia.

However, it's important to remember that while these concepts can be useful for

understanding and analyzing stories, they're not rules that all good stories must follow. The

world of literature and drama is vast and diverse, with many different approaches to

creating powerful, moving stories.

Aristotle's ideas in The Poetics, including peripeteia and hamartia, have provided a

framework for discussing and understanding tragedy for over two thousand years. Whether

Easy2Siksha

we fully agree with them or not, they remain an important part of how we think about

storytelling and human nature.

2.Highlighting the importance of Catharsis, elaborate Aristotle's theory of the function of

Tragedy.

Ans: Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy and Catharsis:

To understand Aristotle's theory of tragedy and the importance of catharsis, let's break it

down into smaller, more manageable parts. We'll start with some background information

and then delve into the specifics of his theory.

1. Who was Aristotle?

Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived from 384 to 322 BCE. He was a

student of Plato and is considered one of the most influential thinkers in Western

philosophy. Aristotle wrote about many subjects, including logic, metaphysics, ethics,

biology, and of course, literature and drama.

2. What is Aristotle's "Poetics"?

The "Poetics" is a work by Aristotle that focuses on the art of poetry and drama. It's one of

the earliest surviving works of dramatic theory and literary criticism. In this work, Aristotle

discusses various forms of poetry, but he pays special attention to tragedy, which he

considered the highest form of dramatic art.

3. What is a tragedy, according to Aristotle?

In simple terms, a tragedy is a type of play that tells the story of a noble or important

character who experiences a downfall due to their own actions or flaws. Aristotle defined

tragedy as:

"An imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language

embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate

parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the

proper purgation of these emotions."

Let's break this definition down:

• "An imitation of an action": Tragedy represents or imitates real-life actions and

events.

• "Serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude": The story should be important,

have a beginning, middle, and end, and be substantial enough to have an impact.

• "Language embellished": The play should use elevated, poetic language.

Easy2Siksha

• "In the form of action, not of narrative": The story should be shown through

characters' actions rather than simply told.

• "Through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions": This is

where catharsis comes in, which we'll explore in more detail.

4. What is catharsis?

Catharsis is a key concept in Aristotle's theory of tragedy. The word "catharsis" comes from

the Greek word "katharsis," which means "purification" or "cleansing." In the context of

tragedy, catharsis refers to the emotional release or purging that the audience experiences

while watching the play.

Aristotle believed that by witnessing the tragic events unfold on stage, the audience would

experience intense emotions, particularly pity and fear. Through this emotional experience,

the viewers would undergo a kind of emotional cleansing or release, leaving the theater

feeling lighter and more balanced.

5. Why is catharsis important in tragedy?

Aristotle saw catharsis as serving several important functions:

a) Emotional Release: By experiencing strong emotions in a controlled, artistic setting,

people could release pent-up feelings in a safe and socially acceptable way.

b) Moral Education: Through witnessing the consequences of the characters' actions, the

audience could learn important moral lessons without having to experience the tragic

events themselves.

c) Psychological Balance: Aristotle believed that experiencing these emotions in a theatrical

context could help restore emotional equilibrium in the viewers' lives.

d) Pleasure: Paradoxically, Aristotle argued that the experience of these negative emotions

in the context of art could lead to a unique form of pleasure.

6. How does a tragedy create catharsis?

Aristotle outlined several elements that a good tragedy should have to effectively create

catharsis:

a) Plot: The story should be well-structured with a clear beginning, middle, and end. It

should have a single, focused action that builds to a climax.

b) Character: The main character (protagonist) should be a person of high status or noble

character who has a tragic flaw (hamartia) that leads to their downfall.

c) Thought: The play should explore important themes and ideas through the characters'

words and actions.

d) Diction: The language used should be appropriate to the characters and situation, often

elevated or poetic.

Easy2Siksha

e) Music: In Greek tragedy, music played an important role in enhancing the emotional

impact of the play.

f) Spectacle: While Aristotle considered this the least important element, visual aspects like

costumes and stage design could contribute to the overall effect.

7. The Tragic Hero:

Central to Aristotle's concept of tragedy is the idea of the tragic hero. This character is

crucial in creating the emotional impact necessary for catharsis. The tragic hero should have

several key characteristics:

a) Noble or High-Born: The hero should be of high social status or have admirable qualities,

making their fall more dramatic.

b) Relatable: Despite their elevated status, the hero should be relatable enough for the

audience to empathize with them.

c) Tragic Flaw (Hamartia): The hero should have a flaw or make an error in judgment that

leads to their downfall. This flaw is often related to hubris (excessive pride) or a lack of self-

knowledge.

d) Reversal of Fortune (Peripeteia): The hero should experience a dramatic change in

circumstances, usually from good to bad.

e) Recognition (Anagnorisis): The hero should come to a realization about their situation,

often too late to change their fate.

f) Excessive Suffering: The hero's punishment should exceed their crime, evoking pity from

the audience.

8. How Pity and Fear Lead to Catharsis:

Aristotle emphasized two primary emotions that tragedy should evoke in the audience: pity

and fear.

a) Pity: The audience feels sympathy for the tragic hero's suffering. We recognize that their

fate is worse than they deserve, even if it results from their own actions.

b) Fear: The audience experiences a sense of dread or anxiety, recognizing that if such

misfortune can befall a great person, it could happen to anyone, including themselves.

By experiencing these emotions intensely but in a safe, fictional context, the audience

undergoes catharsis. They feel these strong emotions but without the real-life

consequences, allowing for a kind of emotional release and cleansing.

9. Examples of Catharsis in Greek Tragedy:

To better understand how catharsis works in practice, let's look at a few examples from

famous Greek tragedies:

Easy2Siksha

a) "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles: In this play, Oedipus unknowingly kills his father and

marries his mother, fulfilling a prophecy he tried to avoid. When he discovers the truth, he

blinds himself in anguish. The audience feels pity for Oedipus, who tried to do the right

thing but was undone by fate and his own pride. They also feel fear, recognizing how little

control we sometimes have over our destinies.

b) "Medea" by Euripides: Medea, betrayed by her husband Jason, takes revenge by killing

their children. The audience feels horror at her actions but also pity for her suffering and the

extremes to which she is driven. The fear comes from recognizing the destructive potential

of unchecked passion and revenge.

c) "Antigone" by Sophocles: Antigone defies the king's order and buries her brother, leading

to her own death. The audience pities Antigone's loyalty and courage while fearing the

consequences of standing up against unjust authority.

10. The Lasting Impact of Aristotle's Theory:

Aristotle's ideas about tragedy and catharsis have had a profound and lasting impact on

Western literature and drama. Even today, many of the principles he outlined are still used

in storytelling, not just in theater but also in film, television, and literature.

a) Character Development: The concept of the tragic hero with a fatal flaw continues to be

a staple of storytelling across mediums.

b) Emotional Impact: The idea that stories should evoke strong emotions in the audience

remains a key principle in writing and filmmaking.

c) Narrative Structure: Aristotle's emphasis on a well-structured plot with a clear beginning,

middle, and end continues to influence how stories are told.

d) Thematic Depth: The notion that art should explore important themes and ideas is still

central to how we evaluate literature and drama.

e) Catharsis in Modern Media: While we may not use the term "catharsis," the idea that

experiencing emotions through art can be psychologically beneficial remains popular.

11. Criticisms and Alternate Interpretations:

While Aristotle's theory has been hugely influential, it's important to note that it has also

faced criticisms and alternate interpretations:

a) Ambiguity: The exact meaning of catharsis has been debated by scholars for centuries.

Some interpret it as a literal purging of emotions, while others see it as more of a

clarification or learning process.

b) Limited Scope: Aristotle's theory was based on a specific type of Greek tragedy and may

not apply universally to all forms of drama or storytelling.

c) Oversimplification: Some argue that the emotional impact of tragedy is more complex

than just pity and fear leading to catharsis.

Easy2Siksha

d) Cultural Specificity: The theory may be more applicable to ancient Greek culture than to

modern, diverse global audiences.

12. Applying Aristotle's Theory to Modern Storytelling:

Despite these criticisms, many aspects of Aristotle's theory remain relevant in modern

storytelling. Here are some ways we can see his ideas at work today:

a) In Film: Many successful films follow the structure of tragedy, with a flawed protagonist

facing consequences for their actions. Think of characters like Michael Corleone in "The

Godfather" or Anakin Skywalker in the "Star Wars" prequels.

b) In Television: Long-form television series often explore complex, flawed characters over

time, allowing for deep character development and emotional engagement. Shows like

"Breaking Bad" or "Game of Thrones" often evoke strong emotions in viewers, potentially

leading to a cathartic experience.

c) In Literature: Many novels continue to use the principles of tragic storytelling, creating

deeply flawed but relatable characters whose actions lead to dramatic consequences.

d) In Video Games: Interactive storytelling in video games often employs elements of

tragedy, allowing players to experience the consequences of their characters' actions

directly.

13. The Psychological Perspective on Catharsis:

Modern psychology has also engaged with the concept of catharsis, though not always in

ways that align with Aristotle's theory:

a) Emotional Release: Some psychologists have supported the idea that expressing or

"venting" emotions can be beneficial, which seems to align with Aristotle's concept of

catharsis.

b) Cognitive Reappraisal: Others argue that the benefit comes not from emotional release,

but from gaining new perspectives on emotional situations, which tragedy might facilitate.

c) Empathy and Social Bonding: Experiencing strong emotions together, even in a theatrical

context, might help build empathy and social connections.

d) Exposure Therapy: Some have drawn parallels between catharsis and exposure therapy,

where controlled exposure to fear-inducing stimuli can help reduce anxiety over time.

14. The Role of Catharsis in Emotional Intelligence:

In recent years, there's been increased focus on the importance of emotional intelligence -

the ability to recognize, understand, and manage our own emotions and those of others.

Aristotle's theory of catharsis can be seen as an early recognition of the importance of

emotional processing:

a) Emotional Awareness: By experiencing strong emotions through art, we may become

more aware of our own emotional responses.

Easy2Siksha

b) Emotional Regulation: The controlled environment of theater (or other forms of

storytelling) allows us to experience and process emotions in a safe context.

c) Empathy Development: By feeling pity for characters, we may develop greater empathy

for others in real life.

d) Stress Relief: The release associated with catharsis might serve as a form of stress relief

or emotional reset.

Conclusion:

Aristotle's theory of tragedy and the concept of catharsis have had a profound impact on

how we understand storytelling and its effects on audiences. By highlighting the importance

of evoking strong emotions - particularly pity and fear - and providing a means for their

release or processing, Aristotle recognized the powerful psychological role that art can play

in our lives.

While modern interpretations and applications of catharsis may differ from Aristotle's

original concept, the core idea remains relevant: experiencing emotions through art can be

a powerful, transformative experience. Whether we're watching a Greek tragedy, a modern

film, or playing a video game, the principles Aristotle identified continue to shape how we

create and consume stories.

As we continue to explore the psychological impacts of storytelling and the role of emotions

in our lives, Aristotle's insights remain a valuable starting point. His theory reminds us that

art is not just for entertainment, but can serve important psychological and social functions,

helping us process complex emotions, gain new perspectives, and potentially achieve a

sense of emotional balance or release.

In our modern world, filled with various forms of media and storytelling, understanding

these principles can help us appreciate the deeper functions of the stories we engage with

and perhaps allow us to more fully benefit from the emotional journeys they take us on.

SECTION-B

3.Faustus is, true to his scholarly status, a protagonist who hovers between dreams of

luxury and power, as well as his wish to do something good for others.

Ans: Doctor Faustus is the main character, or protagonist, in Christopher Marlowe's play. As

a scholar, Faustus is a very smart and educated person. He knows a lot about different

subjects like medicine, law, and religion. But even though he's so smart, Faustus isn't

satisfied with what he has achieved in life. He wants more - much more.

1. Dreams of luxury and power: Faustus is attracted to the idea of having a lot of

money, fancy things, and control over others. He imagines how great it would be to

Easy2Siksha

have magical powers that could give him anything he wants. It's like a kid dreaming

about being able to eat all the candy in the world or have every toy they've ever

wanted.

For Faustus, luxury means things like:

• Wearing expensive clothes

• Eating the best food

• Living in a big, beautiful house

• Having servants to do everything for him

• Being able to travel anywhere in the world

And when it comes to power, Faustus dreams about:

• Being able to control the weather

• Making himself invisible

• Traveling through time

• Commanding spirits and demons

• Having kings and rulers bow down to him

These dreams show that Faustus isn't completely happy with his life as a scholar. He wants

more excitement, more riches, and more control over the world around him. It's like he's

tired of just reading about amazing things in books - he wants to experience them for

himself.

2. Wish to do something good for others: At the same time, Faustus isn't just thinking

about himself. He also has ideas about how he could use his knowledge and power

to help other people. This shows that deep down, he's not a completely selfish

person. He can imagine ways that his abilities could make the world a better place.

Some of the good things Faustus thinks about doing include:

• Curing diseases and healing sick people

• Protecting his country from enemies

• Helping poor people get food and money

• Making scientific discoveries that could improve people's lives

• Using his magical powers to stop natural disasters like floods or earthquakes

These ideas show that Faustus has a caring side. He can see beyond his own wants and

needs to think about how he could make life better for others. It's like when a child says

they want to be a doctor or a firefighter when they grow up - they're imagining how they

could help people in need.

Easy2Siksha

Now, the interesting thing about Faustus is that he's caught between these two different

desires. On one hand, he wants all the good things for himself - money, power, and exciting

experiences. But on the other hand, he also wants to use his abilities to do good in the

world. This creates a kind of tension or conflict inside him.

Think of it like having a little angel on one shoulder and a little devil on the other. The angel

is telling Faustus to use his knowledge and power to help others, while the devil is tempting

him with promises of wealth and control. Faustus isn't sure which voice he should listen to.

This internal struggle is what makes Faustus an interesting character to watch or read about.

We can see parts of ourselves in him. Most people have experienced wanting something for

themselves while also feeling like they should do something to help others. It's a very

human problem.

In the play, we see Faustus make choices that show both sides of his personality. Sometimes

he does things just for his own pleasure or to show off his power. Other times, he considers

using his abilities in ways that could benefit other people. This back-and-forth between

selfish desires and altruistic (helpful) impulses is a big part of what drives the story forward.

It's important to understand that Faustus isn't simply a "good" character or a "bad"

character. He's complex, just like real people are. He has moments where he seems noble

and selfless, and other moments where he's selfish and cruel. This complexity is what makes

him feel like a real person rather than just a character in a story.

The fact that Faustus is a scholar is also important to how we see him. As someone who has

spent his life studying and learning, he represents the pursuit of knowledge. But the play

asks us to think about what the limits of human knowledge should be. Is it okay to try to

know everything? Are there some kinds of knowledge that are dangerous or wrong to

pursue?

Faustus's desire for more than just book learning shows us that sometimes people can

become frustrated with the limits of traditional education. He wants to go beyond what he

can learn from books and teachers. He wants to experience things for himself and have

powers that go beyond what normal humans can do.

This desire for more than human knowledge is what leads Faustus to make a very dangerous

decision. He decides to learn about magic and make a deal with the devil. He thinks this will

give him the power and knowledge he craves. But as we see in the play, this decision has

terrible consequences for Faustus.

By making this choice, Faustus shows us how powerful the desire for luxury and power can

be. He's willing to risk his soul - the most important part of himself according to Christian

beliefs - just to have these things he wants. This tells us that his selfish desires are very

strong, maybe even stronger than his wish to do good for others.

However, even after making this dangerous deal, we still see moments where Faustus thinks

about using his new powers to help people. This shows that his good side isn't completely

gone. He still has the capacity to think about others and want to do the right thing. But

Easy2Siksha

because he's made this deal with the devil, it becomes harder and harder for him to act on

these good impulses.

As the play goes on, we see Faustus struggle more and more with the consequences of his

choice. He enjoys the luxury and power he's gained, but he also starts to realize the terrible

price he'll have to pay. This creates a lot of fear and regret in him. It's like someone who's

bought something expensive on credit and is now worried about how they'll pay the bill

when it comes due.

Faustus's story is a warning about the dangers of wanting too much. It shows us that

sometimes, the things we think will make us happy can actually lead to our downfall. The

play asks us to think about what's really important in life. Is it better to have lots of money

and power, or to use our abilities to help others? Is knowledge always a good thing, or are

there some things we're better off not knowing?

These are big questions that don't have easy answers. That's part of why "Doctor Faustus" is

still read and performed today, even though it was written hundreds of years ago. The

issues it deals with are still relevant to our lives.

In many ways, Faustus represents the struggle that many people face between their selfish

desires and their better nature. We all have times when we want things for ourselves, even

if getting those things might hurt others or go against our moral beliefs. And we all have

times when we feel the urge to help others or do something good for the world.

The play doesn't give us a simple answer about which path is right. Instead, it shows us the

consequences of Faustus's choices and lets us think about what we would do in his

situation. Would we be tempted by the promise of magical powers and unlimited

knowledge? Or would we be scared of the price we'd have to pay?

Faustus's journey also makes us think about the nature of happiness. He believes that

having luxury, power, and knowledge will make him happy. But as the play goes on, we see

that these things don't bring him the satisfaction he expected. In fact, they often leave him

feeling empty or scared.

This suggests that true happiness might come from somewhere else. Maybe it comes from

using our abilities to help others, or from being content with what we have rather than

always wanting more. The play doesn't tell us exactly what the answer is, but it encourages

us to think about these important questions.

Another interesting aspect of Faustus's character is how he changes over time. At the

beginning of the play, he's full of confidence and ambition. He thinks he can outsmart

everyone, even the devil. But as time goes on, we see him become more desperate and

afraid. He starts to realize the terrible mistake he's made, but he feels like it's too late to

change course.

This change in Faustus shows us how our choices can shape who we become. Every decision

we make, big or small, affects our character and our future. Faustus's story is a dramatic

example of this, but it applies to our everyday lives too. The choices we make about how to

Easy2Siksha

treat others, how to use our talents, and what to prioritize in life all contribute to shaping

who we are as people.

Faustus's story also touches on the idea of redemption - whether it's possible to come back

from our mistakes and be forgiven. Even when Faustus realizes how badly he's messed up,

he struggles to ask for forgiveness. He's trapped by his pride and his fear. This raises

questions about the nature of forgiveness and whether there's ever a point where it's too

late to change.

In the end, Faustus is a character who makes us think deeply about human nature, the

consequences of our choices, and what's truly valuable in life. His struggle between selfish

desires and the wish to do good reflects conflicts that many of us face in our own lives, even

if not on such a dramatic scale.

By presenting Faustus as a scholar who is pulled between these different desires, the play

encourages us to think about the responsibilities that come with knowledge and power. It

asks us to consider whether having great abilities means we have a duty to use them for the

benefit of others, or if it's okay to use them just for our own pleasure and advancement.

Faustus's story is a cautionary tale, but it's also a deeply human one. It shows us the

potential for both great good and great evil that exists within each person. By watching

Faustus's journey, we're invited to reflect on our own lives, our own choices, and our own

struggles between selfishness and altruism.

In conclusion, Faustus is a complex protagonist who embodies the human struggle between

self-interest and the desire to do good. His story continues to resonate with audiences

because it touches on universal themes and asks questions that are still relevant today.

Whether we're scholars like Faustus or not, we can all learn something from his journey

about the importance of our choices and the true sources of fulfillment in life.

4. 'Mephistophilis, as Faustus's servant and guide, possesses many positive and negative

aspects in replying to Faustus's queries'. Do you agree?

Ans: The character of Mephistophilis in Christopher Marlowe's play Doctor Faustus is complex and

plays a significant role in shaping the journey of Faustus. He serves as both a guide and servant to

Faustus, but his role is marked by both positive and negative traits. Let’s explore the various aspects

of Mephistophilis' character in relation to Faustus's queries, considering his motivations, actions, and

the moral consequences of his guidance.

Mephistophilis as a Complex Character

Mephistophilis is a demon who serves Lucifer, and his main task is to secure Faustus's soul

in exchange for knowledge and magical power. While he appears to be obedient and

Easy2Siksha

helpful, his actions and words reveal a dual nature, where both positive and negative

qualities come to light.

Positive Aspects of Mephistophilis:

1. Provider of Knowledge: One of the reasons Faustus summons Mephistophilis is to

gain knowledge and power beyond what humans can typically attain. Mephistophilis

does offer Faustus this knowledge, answering many of his questions about the

nature of hell, the cosmos, and the spiritual realm. This thirst for knowledge is what

drives Faustus, and Mephistophilis appears to fulfill that desire to some extent.

However, the knowledge he provides often comes with limitations, as we'll see in his

negative aspects.

2. Faithful Servant: After Faustus signs his pact with Lucifer, Mephistophilis becomes

his servant, adhering to Faustus's commands and helping him perform various feats

of magic. From summoning spirits to granting Faustus the ability to control elements,

Mephistophilis acts according to the agreement and provides Faustus with the

powers he craves. He is reliable in fulfilling the practical aspects of the pact.

3. Honesty About Hell: Mephistophilis does not sugarcoat the reality of hell. In one key

moment, when Faustus asks about the nature of hell, Mephistophilis gives a very

honest and sobering answer. He explains that hell is not just a place but a state of

being, and that the torment of separation from God is an eternal one. This moment

shows that Mephistophilis is capable of giving truthful answers, even though Faustus

chooses to ignore the warning.

Mephistophilis says:

"Why, this is hell, nor am I out of it.

Think'st thou that I, who saw the face of God

And tasted the eternal joys of heaven,

Am not tormented with ten thousand hells,

In being deprived of everlasting bliss?"

This confession reveals the pain and regret that Mephistophilis feels, and in a way, it serves

as a warning to Faustus. Despite being a servant of Lucifer, Mephistophilis is clear about the

consequences of turning away from God.

Negative Aspects of Mephistophilis:

1. Manipulator: Although Mephistophilis provides Faustus with knowledge, he

withholds the full truth and subtly manipulates Faustus throughout the play. He

presents hell as inevitable and downplays the possibility of redemption. Even when

Faustus begins to doubt his decision and thinks of repentance, Mephistophilis

distracts him with temptations and worldly pleasures. For instance, when Faustus

contemplates repentance, Mephistophilis brings forth demons or shows Faustus

visions of beautiful women to steer him away from thoughts of redemption.

Easy2Siksha

2. Enabler of Faustus’s Downfall: Mephistophilis is directly complicit in Faustus’s moral

and spiritual downfall. Although he is honest about the reality of hell, he continues

to encourage Faustus’s pursuit of temporary pleasures and power. His role is to keep

Faustus bound to the pact with Lucifer, and he does so by continually tempting

Faustus with earthly delights. Mephistophilis’s loyalty to Lucifer overrides any

empathy he might have for Faustus, and his ultimate goal is to lead Faustus to

eternal damnation.

3. False Friendship: Mephistophilis often presents himself as a friend to Faustus, but

this friendship is a facade. In truth, Mephistophilis has no concern for Faustus's well-

being. His purpose is to carry out Lucifer's will, which is to claim Faustus's soul. There

are moments where Faustus sees Mephistophilis as a confidant, but these moments

of trust are based on illusion. In reality, Mephistophilis is using Faustus for his own

gain, and his loyalty is not to Faustus but to Lucifer.

4. Cruel Indifference: Throughout the play, Mephistophilis shows little empathy toward

Faustus. Even though he once experienced the glory of heaven and now suffers the

torment of hell, he does nothing to prevent Faustus from making the same mistakes.

Instead of warning Faustus more strongly or showing genuine concern for his soul,

Mephistophilis watches as Faustus descends deeper into sin and damnation. His

indifference to Faustus’s fate highlights his role as a servant of evil.

5. Failure to Provide True Fulfillment: One of the great tragedies of Faustus’s journey is

that the knowledge and power he receives from Mephistophilis do not bring him

true satisfaction. Faustus gains the ability to perform magic and influence others, but

these abilities feel shallow and temporary. Mephistophilis does not provide Faustus

with the deep, meaningful knowledge or power he craves. Instead, Faustus is left

feeling empty and unfulfilled, constantly searching for more but never truly satisfied.

This failure to provide genuine fulfillment is a negative aspect of Mephistophilis’s

guidance.

Mephistophilis's Influence on Faustus’s Choices

Mephistophilis’s presence in Faustus’s life is both a blessing and a curse. On one hand, he

provides Faustus with the power he desires, but on the other hand, he leads Faustus away

from redemption and ensures his ultimate downfall. Mephistophilis plays a pivotal role in

shaping Faustus’s journey, influencing his decisions, and guiding him down a path of

destruction.

The Role of Free Will

It’s important to note that while Mephistophilis is a manipulator and enabler, Faustus still

possesses free will. Mephistophilis does not force Faustus to sign the pact or to reject God;

Faustus makes those choices on his own. Throughout the play, Faustus has opportunities to

repent and turn back to God, but he consistently chooses not to. Mephistophilis may tempt

and mislead Faustus, but Faustus is ultimately responsible for his own fate. This highlights

Easy2Siksha

the theme of free will in the play, where Faustus’s decisions are his own, even if they are

influenced by external forces like Mephistophilis.

Conclusion: A Dual Role of Service and Deception

Mephistophilis’s character embodies both positive and negative traits in his relationship

with Faustus. As Faustus’s servant, he fulfills his duties and provides Faustus with knowledge

and power, but he also manipulates and deceives Faustus, leading him down a path of

damnation. His honesty about hell contrasts with his role as an enabler of Faustus’s

downfall, creating a character that is both complex and morally ambiguous.

In responding to Faustus’s queries, Mephistophilis offers a mixture of truth and deception.

He gives Faustus glimpses of the reality of hell and the consequences of his actions, but he

also withholds the full truth and manipulates Faustus into continuing his path toward

destruction. Ultimately, Mephistophilis’s role is to serve Lucifer and ensure that Faustus’s

soul is damned, making him a servant not of Faustus, but of evil.

This duality in Mephistophilis’s character reflects the broader themes of the play, including

the tension between knowledge and ignorance, power and powerlessness, and salvation

and damnation. In the end, Mephistophilis’s influence on Faustus is a tragic one, as he helps

to guide Faustus toward his ultimate destruction while offering only the illusion of

friendship and service.

SECTION-C

5. Discuss Hamlet as a play which involves several natural and supernatural 'agencies' in

attempting to resolve the protagonist's dilemma following his father's 'foul' murder.

Ans: Introduction

"Hamlet," written by William Shakespeare around 1600, is one of the most well-known

tragedies in English literature. The play follows the young prince Hamlet as he deals with the

aftermath of his father’s murder. Central to the play is the tension between natural and

supernatural elements that shape Hamlet's journey. The "natural" refers to the physical and

everyday world, including human emotions, politics, and relationships, while the

"supernatural" involves the appearance of ghosts, omens, and otherworldly interventions.

These forces come together to create a complex web of events that drive Hamlet's internal

struggle—how to respond to the "foul" murder of his father.

In Hamlet, the supernatural plays a critical role, starting with the ghost of King Hamlet,

which sets the plot in motion. This spectral presence informs Hamlet that his father’s death

was not a natural one but a murder carried out by his uncle, Claudius. This revelation throws

Hamlet into a dilemma, and he struggles throughout the play to decide whether he should

take revenge or not. The play’s natural and supernatural forces work together to create a

haunting exploration of Hamlet’s moral and psychological turmoil.

Easy2Siksha

The Supernatural in Hamlet

The supernatural is a major force that propels the action in "Hamlet." From the very

beginning, the play introduces us to the ghost of King Hamlet. This ghost isn’t just a vision; it

serves as a crucial plot device. Its appearance raises questions about the reality of the ghost

and its message. Hamlet is skeptical at first. He wonders whether the ghost is a demon in

disguise, tempting him to commit sin, or whether it is truly his father's spirit calling for

revenge.

The ghost brings an element of the unknown into the story. It represents a world beyond

human comprehension—a world of spirits, revenge, and possible damnation. The

uncertainty surrounding the ghost is symbolic of Hamlet's own uncertainty. Throughout the

play, Hamlet struggles to believe fully in the ghost and his message. He questions whether

he can trust the ghost's words or if the apparition is trying to deceive him.

However, the ghost does more than just appear to Hamlet. It plays a significant role in

driving the plot and Hamlet’s inner conflict. When Hamlet speaks to the ghost in Act 1,

Scene 5, it commands him to avenge his father’s murder by killing Claudius, but it also tells

him not to harm his mother, Queen Gertrude. This command sets Hamlet’s course of action

for the rest of the play, but it also complicates his task. Hamlet is caught between obeying

the ghost and his own conscience, which makes him hesitate.

Additionally, the ghost’s appearance symbolizes a disruption in the natural order. In

Elizabethan times, people believed that when a ruler was unjustly killed, it upset the balance

of the universe. The ghost’s presence is a sign that something is deeply wrong in Denmark, a

kingdom plagued by corruption and betrayal.

Hamlet’s Dilemma and Human Nature

While the ghost represents the supernatural forces in "Hamlet," the protagonist’s internal

conflict reflects the natural, human struggle with morality, justice, and decision-making.

After learning of his father’s murder, Hamlet is overwhelmed by feelings of grief, anger, and

confusion. He knows that his uncle Claudius is guilty, but the idea of committing murder,

even in the name of revenge, deeply troubles him. His hesitation is not just because of fear,

but because of his moral and philosophical doubts.

Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, "To be or not to be," captures his inner turmoil. In this speech,

he questions whether it is better to suffer through life’s hardships or to take action, even if

that action involves violence. He is torn between his duty to avenge his father and his fear of

the consequences—both in this life and in the afterlife. This reflects Hamlet's philosophical

nature. He is a thinker, not a man of immediate action. He weighs his options carefully,

trying to find the best course of action.

Throughout the play, Hamlet delays in killing Claudius. He stages a play, "The Mousetrap,"

to confirm Claudius’s guilt. Even after the king’s guilt is confirmed, Hamlet still hesitates. He

catches Claudius praying, but decides not to kill him because he fears that doing so would

send Claudius to heaven. This shows that Hamlet is not just driven by revenge; he is

concerned about the moral and spiritual implications of his actions.

Easy2Siksha

Moreover, Hamlet’s relationships with other characters also reflect his natural, human

struggles. His bond with his mother Gertrude is complex. He feels betrayed by her marriage

to Claudius, but he also loves her and doesn’t want to hurt her. His relationship with

Ophelia, the woman he loves, becomes strained as he descends further into madness.

Hamlet’s treatment of Ophelia, including his harsh words and erratic behavior, illustrates

how his internal conflict is affecting his interactions with those around him.

Claudius: The Natural Villain

Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle, represents the natural world of power, ambition, and corruption.

He is a calculating and manipulative ruler who murders his brother, King Hamlet, to take the

throne and marry Gertrude. Claudius’s rise to power is not aided by any supernatural force

but by his own cunning and ruthlessness. He is a skilled politician who knows how to

manipulate people to achieve his goals. Claudius’s natural abilities make him a formidable

opponent for Hamlet.

However, Claudius is not without his own struggles. In one of his soliloquies, Claudius admits

to feeling guilt for his crime. He tries to pray for forgiveness but finds that he cannot

because he still enjoys the benefits of his crime—power and wealth. This moment of

vulnerability adds depth to Claudius’s character. While he is undoubtedly a villain, he is also

a human being with his own internal conflicts.

The Natural World of Denmark

The setting of "Hamlet" plays an important role in the conflict between natural and

supernatural forces. The play takes place in Denmark, a kingdom plagued by corruption,

betrayal, and decay. The natural world in "Hamlet" is one of disorder and chaos. The ghost’s

appearance is a symptom of the larger political and moral corruption in the kingdom.

Throughout the play, there are references to disease, rot, and decay, symbolizing the moral

corruption in Denmark. For example, Marcellus’s famous line, "Something is rotten in the

state of Denmark," highlights the sense of unease and disorder in the kingdom. The imagery

of decay reflects the theme of death, which looms large over the play. Hamlet is constantly

confronted with death—whether it is his father’s murder, Ophelia’s suicide, or the

graveyard scene where he reflects on the inevitability of death.

The natural world in "Hamlet" is also one of political intrigue and power struggles. Claudius’s

rise to power is the result of murder and deceit, and his reign is marked by instability and

fear. Hamlet’s delay in taking action is partly due to the complexity of the political situation.

He is not just dealing with a personal vendetta; he is navigating a dangerous political

landscape where every move is watched and every word is calculated.

Hamlet’s Resolution and the Supernatural’s Influence

In the final act of the play, the natural and supernatural forces come together to bring about

the tragic resolution. Hamlet’s hesitation is finally overcome, but it is too late. The ghost’s

initial call for revenge is fulfilled, but at great cost. Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, and Laertes

all die in the final scene, leaving the kingdom in ruins. The supernatural element,

Easy2Siksha

represented by the ghost, has set in motion a chain of events that leads to the destruction

of the entire royal family.

However, the resolution of the play also reflects Hamlet’s growth as a character. By the end

of the play, Hamlet has come to terms with the inevitability of death. In his final soliloquy,

he says, "There is a divinity that shapes our ends, rough-hew them how we will." This line

suggests that Hamlet has accepted the role of fate and the supernatural in his life. He is no

longer paralyzed by doubt or fear; he is ready to face his destiny.

The play’s tragic ending serves as a reminder of the destructive power of both natural and

supernatural forces. The ghost’s call for revenge leads to bloodshed and death, while the

natural world of politics and power struggles contributes to the downfall of the characters.

In the end, Hamlet’s dilemma is resolved, but it comes at a great cost.

Conclusion

"Hamlet" is a play that masterfully intertwines natural and supernatural elements to explore

the complexities of human nature, morality, and justice. The supernatural presence of the

ghost sets the plot in motion, while Hamlet’s internal struggle reflects the natural, human

difficulties of decision-making, revenge, and morality. The interplay of these forces creates a

rich, complex narrative that captures the essence of tragedy. Ultimately, "Hamlet" is a

timeless exploration of the tension between the seen and unseen forces that shape our

lives, leaving the audience to reflect on the consequences of our actions in both the natural

and supernatural realms.

6. 'The soliloquies of Hamlet in the play are an outstanding aspect of the structure and the

overall intention of the play'. Discuss with examples.

Ans: Introduction

In Shakespeare's Hamlet, the soliloquies of Prince Hamlet stand out as one of the most

essential features of the play. These moments, where Hamlet speaks his thoughts aloud

when no other characters are present, offer insight into his inner conflict, philosophy, and

emotional state. Each soliloquy adds depth to the story and helps the audience to

understand Hamlet’s motivations and struggles. In fact, the soliloquies play such an

important role in the structure and overall message of the play that they are often

considered the heart of Hamlet.

Through the soliloquies, Shakespeare reveals the development of Hamlet’s thoughts, his

contemplation of life and death, his indecision, and his complex relationship with action and

inaction. These monologues allow the audience to follow Hamlet’s emotional journey as he

moves from grief and rage toward eventual acceptance of his fate.

Easy2Siksha

Structure of the Soliloquies in Hamlet

Hamlet is structured around Hamlet’s personal journey, and his soliloquies act as guideposts

to this journey. There are seven major soliloquies that Hamlet delivers throughout the play,

each occurring at a crucial moment in the plot:

1. Act 1, Scene 2: "O, that this too too solid flesh would melt"

2. Act 1, Scene 5: "O all you host of heaven!"

3. Act 2, Scene 2: "O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!"

4. Act 3, Scene 1: "To be, or not to be: that is the question"

5. Act 3, Scene 2: "Tis now the very witching time of night"

6. Act 3, Scene 3: "Now might I do it pat, now he is praying"

7. Act 4, Scene 4: "How all occasions do inform against me"

Each of these soliloquies serves a specific purpose, highlighting Hamlet’s evolving mental

state and moral struggle.

Themes Explored in Hamlet’s Soliloquies

1. Grief and Despair

The first soliloquy ("O, that this too too solid flesh would melt") introduces Hamlet’s

profound grief and depression. Hamlet is deeply affected by his father’s death and his

mother Gertrude’s quick remarriage to Claudius. This soliloquy marks the beginning of

Hamlet’s emotional turmoil, which persists throughout the play.

In this speech, Hamlet expresses a desire to escape the world, wishing that his "too too solid

flesh" would melt or dissolve. He laments the frailty of human life and reveals his disgust at

the seeming moral corruption in the Danish court, especially his mother’s marriage to his

uncle.

This soliloquy not only introduces Hamlet’s deep sense of betrayal but also sets the tone for

his contemplation of death, a theme that runs through the entire play. Hamlet’s melancholy

is evident as he reflects on the futility of life, the inevitability of death, and the weakness of

human nature.

2. Conflicted Duty and Revenge

In Hamlet’s second soliloquy ("O all you host of heaven!"), he has just learned from the

Ghost of his father that Claudius murdered him. The Ghost has commanded Hamlet to seek

revenge, and Hamlet swears to remember his father and pursue vengeance. Yet even at this

early stage, Hamlet is conflicted about carrying out this duty.

This soliloquy illustrates Hamlet’s sense of duty, but it also reveals the tension between his

desire for revenge and his hesitation to act on it. Hamlet feels overwhelmed by the

Easy2Siksha

enormity of the task placed upon him. This hesitation will grow into a significant part of his

character’s inner conflict as the play progresses.

3. Self-Loathing and Inaction

The third soliloquy ("O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!") occurs after Hamlet has seen

the traveling players perform a passionate speech. Hamlet berates himself for his inability to

act with the same passion, despite having more reason to do so (his father’s murder). He

feels ashamed of his inaction and calls himself a coward, accusing himself of failing to fulfill

his promise of revenge.

This soliloquy highlights Hamlet’s increasing self-loathing and his frustration with his

inability to take decisive action. Shakespeare uses this soliloquy to explore Hamlet’s internal

debate over action and inaction. Despite his desire for revenge, Hamlet finds himself

paralyzed by doubt, fear, and uncertainty.

Hamlet questions why he has not yet acted on his father’s behalf, even though the proof of

Claudius’s guilt seems clear to him. This inner struggle becomes a central theme of the play,

with Hamlet’s delay in seeking revenge driving much of the plot.

4. Contemplation of Life and Death

Perhaps the most famous of Hamlet’s soliloquies is the one that begins with "To be, or not

to be: that is the question." In this soliloquy, Hamlet contemplates the nature of existence

and the meaning of life. He wonders whether it is better to endure the suffering and

hardships of life or to escape them through death.

Hamlet’s contemplation of suicide in this soliloquy reflects his deepening despair. He

considers whether the uncertainty of the afterlife is worse than the pain of living. This

speech delves into some of the play’s key philosophical questions, including the nature of

death, the fear of the unknown, and the human instinct to endure suffering.

By the time Hamlet delivers this soliloquy, his inner conflict has reached a peak. He is torn

between his duty to seek revenge, his fear of the consequences of killing Claudius, and his

desire to escape the emotional burden of life. The soliloquy captures the complexity of

Hamlet’s emotional and philosophical turmoil.

5. The Witching Hour and Moral Corruption

In the soliloquy that begins with "Tis now the very witching time of night," Hamlet prepares

himself to confront his mother, Gertrude, after the play-within-a-play. He is filled with anger

and bitterness, not only toward his mother but toward Claudius as well. Hamlet’s rage is

palpable as he speaks of the moral corruption he sees around him.

This soliloquy reveals Hamlet’s determination to finally take action, but it also underscores

his emotional instability. Hamlet’s frustration and anger at the people around him push him

closer to the brink of violence. This soliloquy sets the stage for the emotionally charged

confrontation that will follow between Hamlet and Gertrude in the next scene.

Easy2Siksha

6. Opportunity for Revenge

In the sixth soliloquy ("Now might I do it pat, now he is praying"), Hamlet finds Claudius

alone, praying. This would seem to be the perfect opportunity for Hamlet to fulfill his duty

of avenging his father’s murder. However, Hamlet hesitates once again. He reasons that

killing Claudius while he is praying would send him to heaven, which Hamlet does not want.

This soliloquy marks yet another moment where Hamlet’s philosophical nature prevents

him from taking action. He is concerned not only with achieving revenge but also with

ensuring that Claudius is punished appropriately in the afterlife. Hamlet’s reluctance to act

here leads to further delays in the play’s progression.

7. Final Resolve

The final soliloquy ("How all occasions do inform against me") occurs after Hamlet

encounters the Norwegian army marching toward Poland. He reflects on the determination

of these soldiers, who are willing to risk their lives for a seemingly insignificant piece of land.

Hamlet compares their willingness to fight with his own inaction and resolves to take more

decisive action.

This soliloquy represents a turning point for Hamlet. After spending much of the play

paralyzed by indecision, he finally resolves to move forward with his plan of revenge.

Hamlet’s emotional journey comes full circle as he embraces the idea that action, no matter

the consequences, is necessary.

Conclusion

The soliloquies of Hamlet are crucial to the structure and overall intention of Shakespeare’s

play. Through these speeches, Hamlet reveals his innermost thoughts and struggles,

allowing the audience to follow his emotional and philosophical journey. The soliloquies not

only provide insight into Hamlet’s character but also serve to explore the play’s central

themes of grief, revenge, indecision, and the meaning of life and death.

Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s soliloquies to highlight the complexity of the human mind and

the challenges of navigating moral dilemmas. Hamlet’s inner conflict between action and

inaction, his contemplation of life and death, and his growing despair create a deep

psychological portrait that has fascinated audiences for centuries.

The soliloquies are more than just moments of reflection—they are integral to

understanding Hamlet’s character and the larger message of the play. Without these

soliloquies, much of the emotional and philosophical depth of Hamlet would be lost, making

them an essential part of the play’s overall structure and intention.

Easy2Siksha

SECTION-D

7. 'Volpone is undoubtedly Ben Jonson's most savage comedy that attacks corruption,

greed and immorality'. Discuss.

Ans: Ben Jonson's play Volpone is often described as one of his most powerful and savage comedies.

It explores the darker side of human nature by attacking corruption, greed, and immorality. In this

essay, we will look at the key themes and characters in the play and explain how Jonson uses them

to criticize society. This simplified explanation will help you understand the play in more than 2900

words, keeping it easy to grasp.

Introduction to Volpone

Volpone was written in 1606 and is one of Ben Jonson's most famous plays. The play takes

place in Venice, a wealthy and corrupt city, which Jonson uses as a backdrop to showcase

the greed and corruption of the characters. The title character, Volpone, is a rich man who

pretends to be on his deathbed in order to trick other greedy characters into giving him gifts

in hopes of being named his heir. However, Volpone has no intention of actually dying or

giving away his fortune. Instead, he enjoys watching others compete for his wealth.

Jonson was known for writing plays that criticized the greed and immorality of his time, and

Volpone is no exception. Through the characters and their actions, Jonson makes sharp

observations about human nature, particularly the lengths people will go to for wealth and

power.

Main Themes of Volpone

There are several main themes in Volpone that Jonson explores, including:

1. Greed: The play revolves around the idea of greed. Every character is driven by their

desire for wealth. Volpone, the main character, uses other people’s greed to

manipulate them, while the characters who fall for his trick are just as greedy,

hoping to inherit his fortune.

2. Corruption: Jonson shows how greed leads to corruption. The legal system in the

play is corrupt, and people are willing to betray their morals for money. The

characters in the play are all corrupted by their desire for wealth, and Jonson uses

this to criticize the society of his time.

3. Deception: Deception is another key theme in Volpone. Volpone deceives everyone

by pretending to be sick, and the other characters deceive themselves by believing

they can gain his fortune. The play shows how people often deceive themselves

when it comes to their desires.

4. Immorality: The characters in Volpone are immoral. They lie, cheat, and steal to get

what they want. Jonson uses their immoral behavior to show the audience the

consequences of living a life driven by greed and corruption.

Easy2Siksha

Characters in Volpone

The characters in Volpone each represent different aspects of greed and corruption. Here is

a brief look at the main characters and what they represent:

• Volpone: The title character is a wealthy Venetian nobleman. He pretends to be on

his deathbed to trick others into giving him gifts in hopes of being named his heir.

Volpone’s name means "fox" in Italian, which reflects his cunning and deceitful

nature. He enjoys manipulating others and watching them grovel for his fortune.

Volpone’s greed is not just about money; he also takes pleasure in deceiving others.

• Mosca: Mosca is Volpone’s servant and helps him carry out his schemes. His name

means "fly" in Italian, symbolizing his role as a parasite who feeds off Volpone’s

wealth. Mosca is just as greedy and corrupt as Volpone, and by the end of the play,

he tries to outsmart his master to take the fortune for himself.

• Voltore, Corbaccio, and Corvino: These three men are Volpone’s potential heirs.

Voltore is a lawyer, Corbaccio is an old miser, and Corvino is a jealous merchant. All

three of these characters are willing to give up their dignity and morals for the

chance of inheriting Volpone’s wealth. Their names reflect their personalities—

Voltore means "vulture," Corbaccio means "raven," and Corvino means "crow," all

birds associated with death and scavenging.

• Celia: Celia is Corvino’s wife. She is one of the few morally good characters in the

play, but she is trapped in an abusive marriage. Corvino offers her to Volpone in an

attempt to win his favor, showing how far people will go for wealth.

• Bonario: Bonario is Corbaccio’s son, and like Celia, he is one of the few virtuous

characters in the play. He tries to protect his father from Volpone’s scheme, but he is

framed for crimes he did not commit.

Analysis of the Themes

Now that we have a basic understanding of the characters and the plot, let’s take a deeper

look at how Jonson uses these elements to attack greed, corruption, and immorality.

Greed as the Driving Force

Greed is the primary driving force behind the actions of almost every character in Volpone.

Jonson presents greed as an all-consuming desire that leads people to commit immoral acts.

Each of the potential heirs—Voltore, Corbaccio, and Corvino—is willing to betray their

principles to get their hands on Volpone’s fortune. They bring him lavish gifts, hoping to win

his favor, and in the process, they lose their dignity and integrity.

Volpone himself is greedy, but his greed is different from the other characters. He already

has a fortune but desires more than just wealth. He wants to control and manipulate those

around him, deriving pleasure from their desperation. Volpone’s greed is more

psychological than material, which sets him apart from the other characters, but it is no less

destructive.

Easy2Siksha

Jonson’s portrayal of greed is not limited to individual characters; he uses the play to

comment on the broader social context. In Jonson’s time, greed was rampant in both the

political and legal systems, and Volpone reflects this. The characters’ greed leads to a

breakdown of morality and justice, as they are willing to lie, cheat, and betray others for

personal gain.

Corruption and Its Consequences

Corruption is another key theme in Volpone. Jonson shows how greed corrupts not only

individuals but also the legal and social systems. The courts in the play are shown to be

easily manipulated by the wealthy, and justice is for sale to the highest bidder. This is most

evident in the trial scene, where Volpone and Mosca manipulate the legal system to frame

Bonario and Celia, two innocent characters.

Voltore, a lawyer, is supposed to represent justice, but he is deeply corrupt and only

interested in advancing his own wealth and power. He uses his legal knowledge to

manipulate the courts and serve his own interests, rather than upholding justice. Jonson

uses Voltore to criticize the legal profession, suggesting that lawyers are often more

interested in profit than in doing what is right.

Jonson also shows the personal consequences of corruption. The characters in Volpone are

morally bankrupt, and their corruption leads to their downfall. By the end of the play,

Volpone, Mosca, and the other corrupt characters are exposed and punished. Jonson

suggests that while corruption may bring short-term gains, it ultimately leads to ruin.

Deception and Self-Deception

Deception is central to the plot of Volpone. Volpone deceives everyone by pretending to be

on his deathbed, and the other characters deceive themselves into believing that they will

inherit his fortune. Jonson uses deception to show how easily people can be manipulated

when they are blinded by greed.

Volpone’s deception is a form of power. He enjoys watching others grovel and humiliate

themselves in their quest for wealth. His deception is so convincing that even when the

truth is revealed, some characters refuse to believe it. For example, Corbaccio is so

determined to inherit Volpone’s fortune that he disinherits his own son, Bonario, based on

Volpone’s lies.

Jonson also shows how people deceive themselves. The characters in Volpone are so

consumed by greed that they fail to see the truth, even when it is right in front of them.

They convince themselves that they are acting rationally, even as they engage in immoral

behavior. This self-deception is a key part of Jonson’s critique of human nature. He suggests

that people are often their own worst enemies, blinded by their desires.

Immorality and Its Punishment

The immorality of the characters in Volpone is evident from the very beginning of the play.

Volpone’s scheme is built on lies and manipulation, and the other characters are willing to

engage in immoral acts to achieve their goals. Corvino, for example, offers his wife, Celia, to

Easy2Siksha

Volpone in exchange for the chance to inherit his fortune. This act of selling his wife is one

of the most shocking moments in the play and highlights the depths of Corvino’s immorality.

Despite the widespread immorality in the play, Jonson ensures that justice is served by the

end. Volpone’s deception is exposed, and he is punished for his crimes. Mosca, who tries to

outsmart Volpone and take the fortune for himself, is also punished. Jonson’s message is

clear: while immorality may bring temporary rewards, it ultimately leads to downfall.

Jonson’s portrayal of immorality is not limited to individual characters; he also critiques the

society that allows such behavior to thrive. The corrupt legal system, the greed-driven

society, and the lack of moral integrity are all targets of Jonson’s satire.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Volpone is undoubtedly one of Ben Jonson’s most savage comedies, attacking

the greed, corruption, and immorality of his time. Through the characters and their actions,

Jonson shows the destructive power of greed and the consequences of living a life driven by

self-interest. The play is not only a

8. How do the following characters fit into their 'roles' of beasts and birds in Volpone?

(i) Volpone: Fox

(ii) Mosca: Parasite

(iii) Voltire: Vulture

(iv) Corbaccio: Filthy great raven

(v) Corvino: Carrion Crow

Ans: Volpone is a satirical play written by Ben Jonson in 1606, and it draws heavily on animal

imagery to depict human vices like greed, deceit, and manipulation. The characters are named after

animals, which symbolize their traits and behaviors. Here's a simplified explanation of how these

characters—Volpone, Mosca, and Voltore—fit into their "roles" of beasts and birds:

1. Volpone as the Fox

Volpone’s name literally means "fox" in Italian. Foxes are known for their cunning and sly

nature, which perfectly reflects Volpone's character. In the play, he pretends to be a

wealthy old man on his deathbed to trick other people into giving him gifts in the hope of

being named his heir. His trickery and manipulation are central to his character, just like a

fox who uses cleverness to outsmart others.

Traits of Volpone as the Fox:

Easy2Siksha

Cunning and Deceit: Just as a fox uses its intelligence to survive and outmaneuver

predators, Volpone deceives others to increase his wealth. He is always planning and

scheming to take advantage of people's greed.

• Greed: Foxes are often associated with hoarding or being overly possessive, and

Volpone is similarly obsessed with accumulating wealth. He delights in seeing how

far people will go to win his favor, even though he has no intention of making them

his heirs.

• Manipulation: Volpone manipulates the other characters into believing he is dying,

even going so far as to pretend to be on his deathbed. This is a clever ploy that keeps

people around him, ready to do whatever it takes to get a share of his wealth.

Volpone's character is rooted in the idea of the fox as a trickster. He uses his intelligence

and charm to fool others, but like many trickster figures in literature, his schemes eventually

unravel.

2. Mosca as the Parasite

Mosca is named after the Italian word for "fly," and he represents the role of a parasite in

the play. In nature, parasites feed off other creatures, taking from them without giving

anything in return. Mosca does the same to the people around him, especially Volpone.

Traits of Mosca as the Parasite:

• Opportunistic: Just like a parasite that feeds off its host, Mosca takes advantage of

Volpone's schemes. He knows how to manipulate situations to benefit himself and is

always looking for opportunities to gain more power or wealth.

• Loyal, but Self-Serving: Mosca appears to be loyal to Volpone, but his loyalty is

superficial. His true motivation is his own gain, and he is willing to betray Volpone

when it serves his purpose.

• Flattery and Manipulation: Parasites often find ways to blend in with their hosts,

and Mosca blends into every situation by flattering and manipulating others. He

plays the role of a servant, but in reality, he is just as cunning and deceptive as

Volpone.

• Social Climber: Throughout the play, Mosca's goal is to rise in social status. He uses

Volpone's trick to elevate his position, showing the parasitic nature of feeding off

someone else’s wealth and power to improve his own standing.

Mosca's parasitic behavior makes him a key player in the manipulation and deceit

throughout the play. Like a parasite, he thrives by taking advantage of others, showing no

remorse for his actions.

3. Voltore as the Vulture

Voltore’s name means "vulture" in Italian, which is a bird that feeds on dead animals.

Vultures are often seen as scavengers, and in the play, Voltore represents this role through

Easy2Siksha

his actions. He is a lawyer who is drawn to Volpone because he believes he can "scavenge"

the wealth that Volpone is supposedly leaving behind.

Traits of Voltore as the Vulture:

• Greedy and Predatory: Vultures wait for their prey to die before swooping in to

feed. Similarly, Voltore waits for Volpone’s death, hoping to claim his fortune. He is

willing to act dishonestly, using his skills as a lawyer to manipulate the legal system

for his benefit.

• Self-Interested: Like a vulture that only cares about its next meal, Voltore is solely

interested in what he can get out of Volpone’s supposed death. His profession as a

lawyer gives him the tools to act in a predatory manner, using legal arguments to

position himself as Volpone's heir.

• Deception: Voltore is a master of deception, using his legal knowledge to argue

cases that support his interests, regardless of the truth. His manipulation of the

court mirrors the way vultures take advantage of situations to get what they want.

Voltore’s actions show the connection between the legal profession and scavenging in

Jonson’s satire. His vulture-like behavior is driven by greed, and he is willing to exploit any

situation to his advantage.

The Significance of Animal Imagery in the Play

Ben Jonson’s use of animal imagery in Volpone serves to highlight the moral corruption of

the characters. By naming his characters after animals, Jonson emphasizes their base,

animalistic instincts. Each character’s animal counterpart provides a deeper understanding

of their role in the play.

• Volpone (the fox) represents cunning and deceit. His trickery drives the plot, as he

manipulates those around him for his own amusement and gain.

• Mosca (the parasite) is a social climber who uses his wits to latch onto Volpone and

feed off his schemes. He is opportunistic, always looking for ways to improve his own

standing at the expense of others.

• Voltore (the vulture) is a predatory figure, waiting for Volpone to die so he can

swoop in and claim the fortune. His actions are driven by greed, and he uses his

position as a lawyer to deceive and manipulate.

How These Characters Interact

The interactions between Volpone, Mosca, and Voltore are central to the play’s satire on

greed and corruption. Each character is driven by selfish motives, and their relationships

with one another are built on manipulation and deceit.

• Volpone and Mosca have a master-servant relationship, but it is far more complex.

While Volpone is the mastermind behind the schemes, Mosca is essential in carrying

them out. Mosca flatters and manipulates Volpone, pretending to be loyal while

Easy2Siksha

secretly plotting to take advantage of him. This dynamic reflects the parasitic nature

of their relationship, with Mosca feeding off Volpone’s wealth and power.

• Mosca and Voltore interact in a way that highlights the vulture-like qualities of

Voltore. Mosca plays on Voltore’s greed, convincing him that he will inherit

Volpone’s fortune. Voltore, like a vulture circling its prey, is drawn to Volpone’s

supposed death, ready to swoop in and claim his share. Mosca manipulates Voltore,

just as he manipulates all of the other "heirs," showing his cunning nature as a

parasite.

• Volpone and Voltore have a more indirect relationship. While Volpone is aware of

Voltore’s greed, he does not interact with him as much as Mosca does. Instead,

Volpone watches as Voltore, like the other potential heirs, falls into the trap of

believing that he will inherit Volpone’s fortune. Voltore’s role as the vulture is more

symbolic, representing the predatory nature of those who seek to benefit from

Volpone’s supposed death.

Conclusion

In Volpone, the characters of Volpone, Mosca, and Voltore embody the traits of the animals

they are named after. Volpone, as the fox, is cunning and manipulative, using his

intelligence to deceive others. Mosca, as the parasite, feeds off Volpone’s schemes, always

looking for opportunities to improve his own position. Voltore, as the vulture, is predatory

and greedy, waiting for Volpone’s death so he can claim his fortune. Through these

characters, Ben Jonson creates a satirical commentary on the corrupting influence of greed

and the lengths people will go to in order to achieve wealth and power.

This animal imagery not only deepens our understanding of the characters but also

reinforces the play’s central themes of deception, manipulation, and the moral degradation

caused by greed.

1. Corbaccio:

Corbaccio’s name literally translates to "filthy great raven" or "large crow" in Italian. The

raven, traditionally associated with death, darkness, and decay, symbolizes his aged and

greedy nature. As an elderly man, Corbaccio is deaf, nearly blind, and driven by greed rather

than morality or reason. He is portrayed as foolish, desperate to extend his life and increase

his wealth, even if it means going to extreme and unethical measures.

• Greed and Gullibility: Corbaccio is easily manipulated by Volpone and his servant

Mosca, who take advantage of his avarice. Volpone, a wealthy man feigning illness

and pretending to be on the verge of death, tricks Corbaccio into believing that if he

disinherits his own son and names Volpone his heir, he will receive Volpone’s

fortune upon his death. Corbaccio, blinded by his greed, does not realize that he is

being deceived and is willing to abandon his own family in pursuit of wealth.

• Symbol of Corruption: Corbaccio’s actions reflect the moral decay in society, where

personal gain overrides family ties, loyalty, and basic human decency. His

Easy2Siksha

foolishness, along with his greedy ambition, makes him a symbol of the corrupted

wealthy class in the play.

• Raven Imagery: The raven, in many cultures, is a scavenger bird that feeds on

carrion, linking Corbaccio to the themes of death and decay. His readiness to betray

his own blood for the sake of material gain emphasizes how greed has corrupted him

to the point of inhumanity. The play suggests that such extreme selfishness leads to

moral death, much like the raven feeds on dead flesh.

2. Corvino:

Corvino, whose name means "carrion crow" in Italian, is another important character in the

play. He is a merchant, wealthy but incredibly jealous and possessive. Corvino, like

Corbaccio, is easily manipulated by Volpone and Mosca. His greed, combined with his

irrational jealousy, makes him a deeply flawed and morally corrupt figure.

• Greedy and Manipulative: Corvino is willing to go to unethical extremes for personal

gain. He is led to believe that if he offers his wife, Celia, to the supposedly dying

Volpone, he will be rewarded with Volpone’s wealth. Despite his initial jealousy,

Corvino's greed overpowers any sense of decency or morality, and he forces his wife

into an unbearable situation.

• Jealousy and Insecurity: Corvino's character is also defined by his jealousy and

paranoia regarding his wife. Before being manipulated by Mosca, Corvino is highly

controlling and obsessed with ensuring that Celia remains faithful to him. However,

his desperation for wealth makes him hypocritically betray her when it benefits his

ambitions.

• Carrion Crow Imagery: The carrion crow, like the raven, is associated with death and

feeding on the dead. This imagery reinforces Corvino's role as a character who is

morally dead inside, feeding off the misfortune of others for personal gain. His

treatment of Celia shows his lack of human compassion, and his willingness to

sacrifice her dignity in exchange for money mirrors the way a carrion crow feeds on

death without any conscience.

Themes and Symbolism in Volpone:

The names of both Corbaccio and Corvino are derived from birds known for feeding on

death, which highlights the play’s exploration of the deadly effects of greed, corruption, and

moral decay. Ben Jonson carefully chose these animalistic names to underscore the

inhuman behavior of these characters, whose obsession with wealth leads them to betray

their own values, families, and humanity.

1. Greed and Its Consequences:

The central theme in Volpone is greed. Corbaccio and Corvino represent different aspects of

greed: Corbaccio is greedy for wealth even at the end of his life, and Corvino is greedy for

power and control over others. Both are willing to sacrifice what should be important to

them (family, relationships, morality) for the sake of wealth. However, their greed

Easy2Siksha

ultimately leads to their downfall. Jonson uses these characters to demonstrate that

unchecked greed corrupts the soul and leads to personal and societal decay.

2. Moral Corruption:

Corbaccio and Corvino are examples of individuals who have been morally corrupted by

their desire for wealth. Corbaccio is willing to disinherit his own son, a grave betrayal, while

Corvino is willing to sacrifice his wife’s dignity for financial gain. These actions show how

their greed has led them to lose their sense of right and wrong. They are morally "dead,"

much like the scavenger birds they are named after.

3. Deception:

Both characters are easily deceived by Volpone and Mosca, showing how their greed blinds

them to the truth. Corbaccio is tricked into thinking that he can secure a fortune by

betraying his own family, and Corvino is tricked into believing that offering his wife to

Volpone will bring him wealth. Their inability to see through the deception reflects how

greed can cloud judgment and lead to irrational decisions.

4. Punishment for Greed:

At the end of the play, both Corbaccio and Corvino face consequences for their actions.

Their greed has not only led them to betray those closest to them, but it has also led to their

public disgrace. Jonson uses their downfall to show that those who prioritize wealth above

all else will ultimately be punished for their moral failings.

5. Social Satire:

Jonson's play is a satire, meaning it uses humor and exaggeration to criticize the flaws of

society. Corbaccio and Corvino represent the selfish, greedy individuals in society who are

willing to do anything for personal gain. Through these characters, Jonson criticizes the

corruption of the wealthy class and the moral decay that comes with an obsession with

material wealth. Their exaggerated flaws make them both comical and tragic figures,

highlighting the absurdity and danger of living a life driven by greed.

Character Analysis in Relation to Themes:

Corbaccio:

• Aged Fool: Corbaccio is old and frail, but his greed is as strong as ever. His

desperation to cling to life and wealth even in his old age makes him a pitiful figure.

Jonson portrays him as foolish and easily manipulated, symbolizing how greed can

make people blind to reality.

• Family Betrayal: His willingness to disinherit his own son in favor of a stranger

(Volpone) reveals the depth of his moral corruption. This act of betrayal emphasizes

how greed destroys family bonds and loyalty.

Corvino:

Easy2Siksha

• Hypocrisy: Corvino’s character is filled with contradictions. He is incredibly jealous

and controlling over his wife, but he is willing to prostitute her for financial gain

when it suits him. This hypocrisy underscores the way that greed can lead people to

abandon their principles.

• Cruelty: Corvino’s treatment of his wife, Celia, is particularly cruel. He sees her as a

possession, something he can use to advance his own interests. His lack of empathy

and respect for her shows the dehumanizing effects of greed.

Corbaccio and Corvino in Relation to Other Characters:

In Volpone, Corbaccio and Corvino are part of a group of characters who are all vying for

Volpone’s fortune. Alongside them are Voltore, a lawyer, and Mosca, Volpone’s servant,

who plays a central role in manipulating all of them. Each character represents a different

aspect of greed and moral corruption.

1. Volpone:

Volpone, the titular character, is a wealthy man who pretends to be on his deathbed in

order to deceive others into giving him gifts in the hope of being named his heir. Volpone’s

name means "fox" in Italian, symbolizing his cunning nature. He enjoys tricking others and

takes pleasure in watching them debase themselves in their quest for his fortune.

• Manipulating Corbaccio and Corvino: Volpone and Mosca manipulate Corbaccio and

Corvino by playing on their greed. They know that these men are willing to betray

their own families and morals for the chance at wealth, and they use this knowledge

to control them. Volpone’s enjoyment of this deception highlights the play’s

exploration of the corrupting power of greed.

2. Mosca:

Mosca, whose name means "fly" in Italian, is Volpone’s servant and accomplice. He is the

one who actively manipulates Corbaccio and Corvino, feeding them lies to keep them under

Volpone’s control. Mosca is a clever and deceitful character, representing the opportunistic

individuals who thrive in a corrupt society.

• Master Manipulator: Mosca’s ability to manipulate Corbaccio and Corvino shows

how easily greed can be exploited. He understands that these men are blinded by

their desire for wealth, and he uses this to his advantage. Mosca’s role in the play

demonstrates how greed makes people vulnerable to deception.

Conclusion:

In Volpone, Corbaccio and Corvino are two key characters who represent the destructive

power of greed. Their animalistic names, meaning "raven" and "carrion crow," symbolize

their moral decay and their willingness to feed off the misfortune of others for personal

gain. Through their actions, Ben Jonson critiques the corrupting influence of wealth

Note: This Answer Paper is totally Solved by Ai (Artificial Intelligence) So if You find Any Error Or Mistake . Give us a

Feedback related Error , We will Definitely Try To solve this Problem Or Error.